Letter to the editor
The Committee on Academic Standing (CAS) governs calendar revisions, classroom and academic misconduct, graduation requirements and many other academic policies. It is also the only committee that directly impacts individual students’ lives that still lacks student representation.
After last year’s discussions about increasing student stakeholdership, the previous SGA Vice President for Academic Affairs Julie Hoye ’09 worked with Associate Dean Kathleen Skerrett to add trial memberships for students to CAS. Applicants were thoroughly vetted for the professionalism and confidence that such service would require. The SGA VPAA selected two student applicants to be interviewed by two members of CAS and ultimately appointed by the Dean of the College.
One year and four student representatives later, CAS members, faculty, staff and students alike, unanimously hailed the trial as a success. Committee members reported that student input in forming their policies not only made the process more just, but also provided unique insights about the practical effects of said policies. The Dean of the College, the Chair of the Faculty, Joint Board as a whole and a student initiative that passed overwhelmingly by popular referendum all joined CAS in formally recommending that student membership be made a permanent part of the Committee.
Sadly, on Monday, Feb. 1, the faculty voted 40-32 not only to reject the proposal, but also to immediately end the trial period and remove students from the Committee. Faculty expressed concerns about confidentiality and the appropriateness of students’ proximity to sensitive personal information about their peers.
Students already have extensive experience handling sensitive information on two student life disciplinary boards. For years, students have led the Judicial Council in adjudicating failures of self-governance with varying levels of severity. Starting last fall, SGA and Student Affairs rewrote disciplinary board policies to significantly open up students’ stakeholdership in their own discipline and expand the trust that students place in their peers. The College Hearing Board, where the most severe cases concerning suspension and expulsion are heard, now includes student representation for the first time. Not only have students proven to be competent and professional, but they have time and again supported the notion that judgment by one’s peers is a vital tenet of self-governance.
Every disciplinary board reform was debated, amended and passed in open Joint Board meetings by students’ elected representatives in consultation with the existing members of those boards. Similarly, the proposed reform to CAS was supported not only by every member of the Committee, faculty and staff alike, but was also voted on twice by students, once by their elected representatives and a second time in a campus-wide referendum.
Grinnell College has for years complimented a liberal arts education with what has become one of our community’s defining principles: that students are not only capable of contributing to their own governance, but also that they are made more responsible and intelligent citizens of the world by doing so. We are saddened that a slim majority of the faculty still do not believe students understand the implications of or professionalism required for such shared governance.
CAS, unlike the College Hearing Board, unlike the Budget Steering Committee, unlike the Board of Trustees and unlike the Presidential Search Committee, is now the only committee directly governing student life that operates without students. We are grateful to the faculty that supported this initiative and sincerely hope the faculty who opposed it will reconsider their position.
Members of SGA Cabinet Harry Krejsa ’10, Joanna DeMars ’10, Ben Offenberg ’11, Mairead O’Grady ’10, Alex Peitz ’10, Damian von Schoenborn ’10, Alex Schechter ’10, Gabe Schechter ’12, Ethan Struby ’10 and Cyrus Witthaus ’10
Former CAS Student Representatives Camila Barrios Camacho ’12, Elizabeth Maltby ’11, Jacob Reisberg ’10 and Sam Wice ’09
What Do You Think?
Note on Commenting: All comments are moderated and flagrant content will deleted by the moderator without warning. Repeat offenses will result in a permanent ban on your ability to comment on any articles. Please, take care to be kind and courteous to authors and other commenters. We encourage critical thinking and questioning, but do not let your anonymity on the internet take the best of you.
Subscribe to Our Feeds!
Popular Stories
Recent Comments
Connie Long on Author Bakopoulos illuminates rust belt realities
14 hours ago Interesting article. I'm looking forward to reading the book. Perhaps American...
Colin Brooks on The end of campus bikes?
2 days ago I'm super late to comment on this, but as the nominal program coordinator I feel it's worth...
Bomi Mistry on Kings campus connection revisited
1 week ago Wow! Reading your article about Wilson's visit to the Grinnell College campus reaffirmed that...
Prof. Katya Gibel Mevorach on The state of Middle Eastern Studies at Grinnell
1 week ago I think a distinction might be made between a Concentration whose focus is on Muslim Studies...
Dugan Knoll '12 on Football: brain drain
3 weeks ago @Drax -- I knew some idiots back in high school, but a 560 is the lowest score I have ever heard of. ...
Facebook Activity
Scarlet and Black © 2012 | This site is proudly powered by WordPress
| Editor Login

Opinion

No comments yet
Leave a comment, and get the conversation started!